SM485 vs SM482: A Comprehensive Comparison of New and Old Models of Samsung's Surface Mount Technology (SMT) Machines
When choosing a surface mount technology (SMT) machine or upgrading equipment, many people get stuck on one question: Should they choose SM485 or SM482? Both of these are classic high-speed surface mount technology (SMT) machines from Samsung. They look similar in appearance, even the operation interfaces are quite alike, and the prices are also close. So, what exactly are the differences? Today's article won't beat around the hole. Let's get straight to the point and thoroughly discuss SM485 and SM482 from multiple dimensions such as performance parameters, structural configuration, applicable scenarios, and maintenance costs.
I. Basic Parameter Comparison: Who has stronger Paper Performance?
| Project |
SM482 |
SM485 |
| "Positioning" |
Multi-functional surface mount technology (SMT) machine |
High-speed chip mounter |
| Number of suction nozzles |
Six heads |
Ten heads |
| Theoretical mounting speed |
28,000 CPH |
39,000 CPH |
| Mounting accuracy |
±50μm (CHIP |
±50μm (CHIP |
| PCB size |
Max 460x400mm |
Max 510x460mm |
| Supported component range |
01005~□55mm |
01005~□55mm |
| Visual system |
Flight recognition + fixed camera |
Flight recognition + fixed camera |
| Feeder capacity |
Max 120 |
Max 120 |
Simply put: SM482 leans more towards flexibility, while SM485 leans more towards speed.
Differences in the core structure of surface mount technology (SMT) machines
Second, differences in core structure: These differences determine the application
The number of nozzles is the key difference
The SM485 is equipped with 10 suction nozzle heads (ten-connected heads), which is a full 4 more than the SM482. When running standard components, it can achieve higher parallel mounting efficiency and is particularly suitable for medium and high-speed batch production lines.
The SM482 has six suction nozzles. Although its efficiency is slightly lower, it excels in stability and flexibility, making it suitable for production scenarios with a wide variety of products and frequent line changes.
Due to the different module structures, SM485 runs faster
2. SM485 adopts an enhanced high-speed mounting module, making the motion platform more rigid and responding more quickly. If you are making products with a lot of repetition and high mounting density, such as mobile phone boards and home appliance motherboards, the speed advantage of SM485 will be more obvious.
Although the SM482 is a bit slower, its module is lighter and more compact, making it suitable for handling some precision irregular parts or trial production tasks. It has a fast response during machine adjustment and a short debugging cycle.
Third, the software systems are basically the same and the operation thresholds are similar
Don't worry about whether you can use it or not. Both of these two machines use Samsung's unified operating platform, and their basic operation logic is exactly the same
The programming process is the same (importing coordinates, nozzle matching, visual debugging)
The correction methods are consistent (MARK point alignment, flying shot recognition)
Seamless connection of parameter setting habits (experienced engineers can get started in just a few minutes)
In other words: People who have used SM482 do not need to be retrained to operate SM485.
Iv. Application Scenario Recommendations: How to Choose? The Key Lies in the production tasks
| Application scenarios |
Recommended model |
Reason |
| A wide variety of products in small batches |
SM482 |
Fast switching and flexible debugging |
| Large quantities, single products |
SM485 |
High throughput and stronger efficiency |
| There are a large number of components below 0402 |
SM485 |
High-speed flying shots are more stable |
| Special-shaped parts and standard parts are mixed and pasted |
SM482 |
Flexible configuration and few false alarms |
Some companies have Line A as the main production line for flow, while Line B is used for trial production and small batches. Then, SM485 can be used as the main line and SM482 as the auxiliary line, making the resource combination more flexible.
Maintenance and cost differences of surface mount technology (SMT) machines
V. Maintenance and Cost Differences: This point should be calculated clearly in advance
From the perspective of practical maintenance:
The components of SM482 are more universal and cheaper. Many accessories such as Feida, nozzles and cables can be used interchangeably with the old models.
As a high-end model, SM485 has a high customization rate for some components (such as the nozzle seat and the guide rail motor), resulting in a slightly higher replacement cost.
However, in the long run, SM485 is highly efficient, requires fewer workers and saves a lot of time. Especially in regions where labor costs are high, the longer it is used, the higher its cost performance will be.
Vi. Tips for Purchasing second-hand Phones: Don't just look at the year
Nowadays, many manufacturers are also considering purchasing second-hand machines for production. Regarding the selection suggestions for SM482 and SM485:
SM482: It is recommended to choose the version produced after 2015, as the system is more stable.
SM485: Check the running volume. Never choose the "runaway" type (that is, the running volume is too large or the components are severely aged).
Pay attention to the version number! Some software in the new version of SM485 requires system upgrades; otherwise, there will be many compatibility issues.
In a nutshell, who should I choose?
Limited budget, multiple models, and frequent switching? Choose SM482, which is sufficient for easy debugging.
Large order volume and high production capacity requirements? The SM485 offers better value for money.
Of course, the most ideal situation would be for the two to run in coordination, with one main line and one auxiliary line, maximizing both efficiency and flexibility.
Your message must be between 20-3,000 characters!
